The Supreme Court decision in Schenck v.
United States (1919) supported the position that
during a national emergency
(1) internal migration may be restricted
(2) civil liberties of United States citizens may be
limited
(3) Congress may take control of the economy
(4) minority groups may be segregated from the
general population
The Supreme Court decision in Schenck v. United States (1919) supported the position that during a national emergency "(2) civil liberties of United States citizens may be limited," since it supported the temporary suspension of free speech.
